Sonoma County
University of California
Sonoma County

Posts Tagged: invasive weeds

(Weed) Science and Replication

I have had the pleasure to conduct a variety of experiments, watch numerous management talks and take many classes on the scientific method. During these adventures I've noticed that people seem to misunderstand (or not comprehend the full power of) replication.

 

Replication is the repetition or duplication of an experiment. On the surface this seems pretty straightforward; why would someone want to replicate or duplicate an experiment? They do it to double-check that the results are correct.

 

If I want to test to see if hummingbirds prefer red or yellow feeders, I can put out two colored feeders and count the number of visits. Great! Right? Not exactly.

 

The experiment is not replicated. What if one feeder is closer to something the hummingbirds do not like? They would avoid that feeder and prefer the other no matter what the color. Replication solves this problem.

 

Professionals get it wrong sometimes too. I just visited a colleague who has a growing facility with 3 replicate greenhouses (3 repeated greenhouses in a row). One of the researchers using his facility had all the trials in one greenhouse. It was the south-facing greenhouse. What if the south-facing greenhouse was slightly warmer than the average greenhouse? They will not know if this influenced the result.

 

How many weed trails have we seen that have been conducted at a site, spray herbicide A here, herbicide B there. Done. Great! Right? Not exactly. It certainly helps to have the initial trial, and its even more helpful to replicate the experiment.

 

Replications can occur across space or time (this sounds like Star Wars), and on the ground it means experiments can be repeated over a variety of distances, or over different seasons.

 

Replications Across Space

Conducting an experiment is good; conducting the same experiment (especially when it comes to weed management) in multiple field sites, counties or states is even better. There are more herbicide resistant weeds in the Central Valley than outside that area. Same species, different resistance. How do we know? Replicated experiments across the state.

 

Replication Across Time

Weed scientists like to conduct herbicide trials, and I do them myself, and how many of them are conducted every year for 5 years at the same site? This type of replication allows one to determine if the result is the same during different years or seasons. Some populations of hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) are resistant to the herbicide glyphosate during the summer, (they will not die when sprayed) but when those same resistant plants are sprayed during the winter they are susceptible (see footnote*). This is fascinating! Spray in summer and it grows like a weed, spray in winter and growth is reduced. The only way this was discovered was by replicating experiments across time; applications were made in spring, summer, fall and winter. On a side note the researchers in charge of this project thought they mixed the resistant with susceptible seeds and repeated (i.e. replicated) the experiment several times until they understood the results!

 

Replication Across Space and Time

It's the gold standard; the researcher conducts an experiment at multiple sites and repeats it over different durations. It also takes a lot of work. One simple experiment now has multiple sub-experiments. But you know how well it really works.

 

In Conclusion

Just because we see weed trials doesn't mean it has been fully vetted. Simple trials are good, they teach us a lot. Multiple trials are better. Control plot, treated plot, good. Control plot, treated plot, repeat, repeat, repeat here, repeat there, repeat next year, and repeat in the winter, ...even better.

 

 

 

*Note: I am not advocating spraying resistant hairy fleabane with glyphosate, you should consider an IVM (or IPM) program to tackle this problem. 

Posted on Monday, August 25, 2014 at 2:28 PM

Cal Ag article: Predicting invasive plants in California (by Brusati et al.)

Link to a recent (July 2014) research article in California Agriculture (link to table of contents for volume 68)

Brad


The article by E.D. Brusati, D.W. Johnson, and J.M. DiTomaso is entitled "Predicting Invasive Plants in California" focuses on risk assessment modeling of plants under consideration for importation through the horticultural industry.

Abstract: 

Preventing plant invasions or eradicating incipient populations is much less costly than confronting large well-established populations of invasive plants. We developed a preliminary determination of plants that pose the greatest risk of becoming invasive in California, primarily through the horticultural industry. We identified 774 species that are invasive elsewhere in Mediterranean climates but not yet invasive in California. From this list, we determined which species are sold through the horticulture industry, whether they are sold in California and whether they have been reported as naturalized in California. We narrowed the list to 186 species with the greatest potential for introduction and/or invasiveness to California through the horticultural trade. This study provides a basis for determining species to evaluate further through a more detailed risk assessment that may subsequently prevent importation via the horticultural pathway. Our results can also help land managers know which species to watch for in wildlands.

Link to full article in California Agriculture

 

arundo donax from CalAg68 pg89 DiTomaso
arundo donax from CalAg68 pg89 DiTomaso

Posted on Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM

The Cooperative Mule

From the Invasive Plants in Southern California blog :: Nov. 22, 2013

 

Hi All. In my last blog the subject was about what I had learned regarding the use herbicides as a tool for effective passive restoration of CSS and native grassland habitats. As an Extension Advisor my job is to not only develop new information, but to also try to move it forward into practice.

In this case that means educating land managers and related professionals on how to efficiently and accurately apply herbicides to large areas. That's what the Cooperative Mule is all about, so sit back, I hope you enjoy the show. By the way, Ryan Krason, our Digital Media Specialist produced this video and came up with the name; I really think he did a great job, so thanks Ryan.

The video [CLICK HERE] is just a general introduction to the potential to use an UTV or ATV for restoration work. I have captured the same information in a PDF that is available on my website at http://ucanr.edu/sites/socalinvasives/Research_Papers/Brochures/ -- look for UTV Sprayer System. As always, if you have questions or comments, please post them below or email them to me at cebell@ucanr.edu. And if you are finding this blog useful, please subscribe and please send me ideas for blog topics.

Please follow me on twitter @CarlEBell.

Posted on Saturday, June 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM

Weed Seed Germination

I'm sure you've noticed that different years have dominant weed species. For example this year in Southern California Russian thistle (aka tumbleweed Salsola tragus among other Salsola species) is abundant in many areas. Other years it is only moderately abundant and some years it seems to hardly hang on. The obvious question is why? Why is there so much variation in abundance between years?

 

Fortunately for us people have been working on this issue for a while and have a few general answers for us. Since the bulk of weeds in California are annuals I'll limit my discussion to those plants.

 

The seeds of annuals germinate only under a certain range of environmental conditions. For example, many winter annuals in California germinate when temperatures are cool or cold. Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii) does not germinate well when the temperatures are above about 85F. Other plants do not germinate when the temperatures are cold. You can see this pattern on THIS page of common garden vegetables by Cooperative Extension in Alabama. There are cold season plants (onion) and warm season plants (tomato, melon).

 

Although we have only one rainy season in California, and sometimes less than that, we still have cool season weeds and warm season weeds. Most of our weedy grasses (like bromes) are cool season, and our late season weeds (like tumbleweed) are warm season. Of course there can be overlap, warm temperatures in the fall can provide suitable conditions for warm season weeds, even though they ‘normally' germinate in the spring.

 

Our ability to predict which weeds will be abundant is hampered by many things; most of all is insufficient data. We know plants respond to soil moisture, soil temperature, oxygen levels in the soil, light levels (seeds can ‘see' light!), scarification (abrasion of the seed coat), soil salinity, age of seed, age of parent plant, and many other factors.

 

Imagine we tested to the germination conditions of 3 weed species for 3 factors (moisture, salinity and light) and each factor at just 3 different levels (high, medium or low), and we replicated this test in 3 different soil types (sandy, loam, silt). In the end, we would have 81 different trials for this simple experiment (weed #1 at high light in loam = 1, …). Barring a large infusion of money to conduct experiments to predict weed germination, and thus examine one factor in the spread and increase in weeds, we will be using coarse measures to figure out the population of weeds.

 

Back to my original question, why was there a lot of tumbleweed this year? Because tumbleweed germinates better in conditions of high light or disturbed soil, with relatively warm temperatures and the seed germinates rapidly, effectively using small amounts of moisture. Given there was limited rainfall early in the winter, which limited production of many cool season weeds, and moderate moisture in the mid spring coupled with a relatively warm winter, conditions were rife for the establishment of tumbleweed.

UC IPM page for tumbleweed is HERE

Posted on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 11:29 AM

New book helps pros manage invasive weeds in California forests

Scotch broom: A beautiful plant, but a forest nightmare.
Beautiful but unwelcome in California wildlands, brooms are shrubs introduced into North America from Europe in the mid-1800s. Common species include Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) and Portuguese broom (Cytisus striatus). Brooms were introduced as ornamentals, but also were used extensively for erosion control along roadsides and in mined areas.

Now growing profusely in California forests, on roadsides, and wildlands, brooms:

  • Crowd out out desirable vegetation
  • Form impenetrable thickets that limit access to some areas
  • Shade out tree seedlings, and make reforestation difficult
  • Burn readily, increasing the intensity of fire, and carry fire to the tree canopy
  • Are toxic to cattle and horses and unpalatable to most wildlife
  • Produce abundant, long-lived seed
  • Are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, giving broom a competitive advantage over native plants

Management of these and other weeds are presented in the recently published second edition of Forest and Right-of-Way Pest Control. Invasive species that create a dangerous wildfire hazard and crowd out desirable vegetation and wildlife are examples of why this book emphasizes vegetation management and pesticide handling, including correct equipment calibration and effective herbicide application. The second edition also provides broader coverage of insects, plant pathogens, vertebrate pests, and the various practices to manage them, recognizing that lands commonly have multiple uses and when and how pests are managed depends on many considerations with sometimes conflicting goals.

Second edition of 'Forest and Right-of-Way Pest Control.'
One of many new features in this edition is a section with expectations and review questions, which will help professionals pass DPR's tough applicator certification examinations. The book may be used as a guide to safe and effective pest management on public and private forests, tree plantations and nurseries, and along roads, railways, utility corridors, biking and hiking trails, and other rights-of-way. Nearly 200 photos and illustrations, 56 tables and sidebars, and 11 main chapters aid in pest identification and problem diagnosis and provide users with pesticide and nonpesticide solutions.

Experts with Cal-Fire, Caltrans, PG&E, USDA Forest Service, private industry, the University of California (UC) Berkeley and Davis campuses, UC County Cooperative Extension offices, and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) contributed to Forest and Right-of-Way Pest Control, prepared by UC ANR's Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program.

Forest and Right-of-Way Pest Control is available for $35 online in the UC ANR Catalog. The table of contents and more information about the book are available on the UC IPM website. You can also preview and electronically search the contents on Google Books.

Posted on Wednesday, March 5, 2014 at 8:46 AM

Next 5 stories | Last story

University of California Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County
133 Aviation Blvd Suite 109, Santa Rosa, CA 95403  Phone: 707.565.2621  Fax: 707.565.2623
Office Hours:  M-F, 8am-Noon & 1pm-4pm

Like us on Facebook: UCCE Sonoma                        Follow us on Twitter @UCCESonoma 

Webmaster Email: kgiovannini@ucdavis.edu